ConCourt closes door on foreign nationals being admitted as lawyers

Date:

ConCourt closes door on foreign nationals being admitted as lawyers

Justice Zukisa Tshiqi – who penned the unanimous decision – found that while the right to choose your trade, occupation or profession freely was enshrined in section 22 of the constitution, the right was only extended to citizens

File. In February, the High Court’s ruling came before the Constitutional Court for confirmation. But the Constitutional Court has now declined to confirm it. Picture: Freeimages.com
  • Constitutional Court
  • Apex court

JOHANNESBURG – The country’s apex court has overturned a ruling that had declared the Legal Practice Act unconstitutional, in so far as it only allows South African citizens or permanent residents, to be admitted as lawyers.

In September, the Bloemfontein High Court declared as unconstitutional and invalid section 24(2) of the Legal Practice Act (LPA) – which states that “a person may only practise as a legal practitioner if he or she is admitted and enrolled to practise as such in terms of this act” and that “the High Court must admit to practise and authorise to be enrolled as a legal practitioner, conveyancer or notary or any person who, upon application, satisfies the court that he or she [among others] is a South African citizen; or permanent resident in the Republic”.

This on the back of two initially separate applications from Lesotho citizens Relebohile Rafoneke and Sefoboko Tsuinyane. Despite the fact that they successfully completed their law degrees and articles in South Africa, the two could not be admitted because of the relevant legislation. The applications were ultimately heard together.

And in February, the High Court’s ruling came before the Constitutional Court for confirmation. But the Constitutional Court has now declined to confirm it.

Justice Zukisa Tshiqi – who penned the unanimous decision – found that while the right to choose your trade, occupation or profession freely was enshrined in section 22 of the constitution, the right was only extended to citizens. “Section 22 is silent regarding non-citizens and, consequently, does not afford that right to them,” she said.

“The Legislature is therefore at liberty to decide how far to extend admission into the legal profession to non-citizens and it has chosen to draw the line at permanent residents. That the Legislature has not gone further to include refugees and asylum seekers cannot be challenged by non-citizens under section 22. They do not enjoy a section 22 right”.

Further more, Tshiqi found the bar on admitting non-citizens or permanent residents, served a legitimate government purpose. “While this policy may be open to debate, the fact that the Legislature has adopted it is not arbitrary or illegitimate. It is restrictive and protectionist, and those are permissible governmental objectives,” she said.

“The simple point is that the Legislature has differentiated between permanent residents and other kinds of residents. It has done so to protect opportunities for South Africans. That is a permissible policy to adopt. There is a proper basis to distinguish the position of permanent residents and other categories of residents. Therefore, the line drawn in the LPA is similarly permissible. This is primarily a policy decision that serves a legitimate government purpose”.

She also highlighted that the non-citizens or permanent residents could still find employment in the broader legal profession that didn’t require admission as a legal practitioner: “They are therefore not left destitute with no alternative source of employment. The activity which the applicants seek constitutional protection for is the enjoyment to choose one’s vocation and as such this cannot be held to amount to unfair discrimination, as this right does not fall within a sphere of activity protected by a constitutional right available to foreign nationals such as the applicants”. Tshiqi added that “it follows that, as the discrimination is not unfair”.

The Minister of Justice, Ronald Lamola, had opposed the confirmation of the High Court’s ruling. In a statement on Tuesday, he welcomed the outcome.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:

Subscribe

Popular

More like this
Related

EU has no basis for cold storage requirements on SA citrus exports – farmers

EU has no basis for cold storage requirements on SA citrus exports - farmers The European Union is demanding that citrus exports from South Africa be subjected to extreme cold storage in a bid to stave off false codling moth infestation. @ proler/123rf.com Citrus exports World Trade Organization SA citrus farmers False codling moth Cold

Eskom submits tariff restructuring application to Nersa

Eskom submits tariff restructuring application to Nersa At this stage, the utility has not indicated how much tariffs could be raised. The new tariffs will come into effect in April. Eskom's Megawatt Park head office in Sunninghill, Johannesburg. Picture: Xanderleigh Dookey Makhaza/Eyewitness News National Energy Regulator of South Africa Eskom tariffs Email Print Tweet Share

Unions: Eskom must improve 3 issues for wage talks to move forward

Unions: Eskom must improve 3 issues for wage talks to move forward Negotiations between the power utility and unions resumed on Friday morning after reaching a dead-end last week. Eskom Megawatt Park. Picture Xanderleigh Dookey-Makhaza/Eyewitness News. Eskom Load shedding NUMSA Wage strike Email Print Tweet Share Theto Mahlakoana | 40 days ago JOHANNESBURG - Trade unions at

City of Cape Town drafts new policy for mobile businesses

City of Cape Town drafts new policy for mobile businesses It drafted a Mobile Business Policy, which aims to support this growing sector by putting measures in place that would make it easier to apply and operate. FILE: Economic Growth Mayor James Vos said the city welcomed innovative ways of doing business that stimulated the